View Single Post
Old
02-19-2013, 08:31 PM
  #293
mesamonster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Scottsdale, AZ.
Country: United States
Posts: 1,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by XX View Post
That's not a fair statement. If your analysis showed losses, like any struggling business, but considerable upside, you'd have a case for buying that asset. It doesn't matter if it's 10 million or 100 million. If you find it a worthwhile venture, the selling price is agreeable. $90 million seems like the market agreed upon bottom value for an NHL team, regardless of history or market. There's little to no built in value beyond simply being an NHL club. If these assets were 100% portable with no concern for leases or anything of the sort, the value would be higher.
Not sure i know what you are referring to regarding upside? In my eyes there is little to no upside for anyone interested in paying 170MM for an asset that will guarantee losses for as far as the eye can see!

mesamonster is offline