View Single Post
Old
02-21-2013, 01:00 AM
  #103
Bryanbryoil
Moderator
 
Bryanbryoil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 54,283
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by raab View Post
If we're moving anyone of the kids it should be RNH. The kid's just not a winner, hasn't won anything at any level he's played. In saying that if we're moving any of the kids the return should be substantial. Something like Couturier+Simmonds+Coburn for RNH+Jones+N.Schultz
Dear lord that is a piss poor idea if I've ever heard one. RNH IMO is the cornerstone of this franchise a future elite #1C aka the kind of player that you don't move unless it's for an already established player in that mold. RNH and Hall are the last 2 forwards on this team that I'd deal, Hall for his speed, will to win, and leadership and RNH for his playmaking ability, defense, and the ability to make plays that most can't even see. If you wnat Couturier badly you move Gagner ++ for him or one of the wingers for Couturier +, you don't move RNH, Hall, or Schultz period. Saying that RNH is not a winner in a TEAM sport is also ridiculous, what did Seguin win prior to winning the friggin' Stanley Cup? Now all of a sudden he's a winner because he was part of a cup winning team? What has anyone on our team ever won? Khabby IIRC won a cup, does that make him some sort of a great player?

__________________
Treat Others As You Would Like To Be Treated
Bryanbryoil is offline