Thread: Prospect Info: Sharks Prospect Info/Discussion 6.0
View Single Post
02-21-2013, 06:33 PM
Registered User
OrrNumber4's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2002
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 7,518
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Kitten Mittons View Post
Those players could be very valuable, especially when you're trying to roll three scoring lines. You don't need to have two-way players dominate your top-6. You can have two responsible players with another one dimensional tweener to excel. You have three of those and you have three scoring lines, as opposed to our quality top-6 and a useless gritty bottom-6. Grabner, Wellwood, Gerbe - players like that. A player like Parenteau would have probably never made it on the Sharks; then again he didn't make it in Chicago or NY either.
You don't need two-way players necessarily (though a good coach will quickly tire of players who are irresponsible defensively, which Kennedy can be), but you need multi-dimensional players. Two-way play is just one of those dimensions.

Ryane Clowe is an example of this. He's not great defensively, but offensively, he's multi-talented. When at his best, he's physical, he can dominate the boards, he can cycle or play off the transition, he has a great shot, he is a good passer, etc. He's also a leader who can fight.

I don't neccessariy think that Grabner, Wellwood, or Gerbe fit your definition. A tweener would be someone like a Plihal (low-end), or Ferriero, or Kaspar. Actually, I am rescinding my comment about Ekman...guy was closer to a Clowe than a tweener...

In any case, do you really think SJ had a Grabner or Wellwood sitting in the system that they didn't give ice time to?

In a way, I see your argment. As I type this, I am rethinking my stance. I would agree that having a "tweener" is OK as long as his linemates compliment him well. However, I think that over time, that player is going to fall out of favor. As soon as injuries or transactions force him into another role, he's going to fail...

OrrNumber4 is offline