View Single Post
02-23-2013, 03:11 PM
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,590
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by superroyain10 View Post
Even if we accept this as true, why use an absolute scale? What would be the point? If Crosby today is better than Gretzky only because Crosby played in the more modern-era, what is the point of comparing them? The newer player always wins!

When people mean better, they often mean greater. Which player was more accomplished, etc.
This is the problem, the new players absolutely has the possibility of being better but the older player also has a weaker pool to dominate in so it works both ways.

Also your line of thinking often gets applied to 06 guys who are "more accomplished" than guys playing in a 21 plus team league.

Hopefully more consideration will be given to these differences in future evaluations and projects.

Hardyvan123 is online now