View Single Post
02-24-2013, 09:31 AM
Asset management
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,811
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Avs71 View Post
Do you think Shattenkirk would have become as good as he is if he stayed with the Avs?
Yes. Offensively, anyway.

Shattenkirk was scoring at a near 50 point pace as a rookie (on a crappy team, no less). That's really an accomplishment. Keith didn't do that. Karlsson didn't do it. Doughty didn't do it. Yandle didn't do it. EJ didn't do it. Suter didn't do it. Shea Weber didn't do it (though he came close). But Shattenkirk was scoring at that pace - so not only was the skill there, the production was already there.

In short, the Avs had something special on their hands.

I have no doubt that he would have grown from there on the Avs also. Now, would he have grown as much defensively? Probably not, no. That was learned by Shattenkirk, and it probably wouldn't have taken place here - Hitchcock vs. Sacco and all that.

Originally Posted by Avs71 View Post
And how much better off do you think the Avs defense would be with him?
Worlds better. Defensively, they might not be much different, but from a goal scoring and transition standpoint, much better. (I'm just plugging him into the current defense there, which includes EJ).

Last edited by ABasin: 02-24-2013 at 09:48 AM.
ABasin is offline