View Single Post
02-24-2013, 02:07 PM
Join Date: Apr 2012
Originally Posted by
Therein lies your problem you are greatly overexaggerating the talent we have. Nash is a 30-35 goal scorer. Gabs is still coming off that shoulder I guarantee it (plus he's just older) and did you REALLY just give Richards that label? Should our PP be better? Oh HELL yea. But we also have to be a little more realistic about what we have in some of these players
realistically gaborik is still a 40 goal scorer. 20 games isn't a big enough sample size to decide otherwise. he has always been a streaky guy. he's under his numbers this season, but who on this team isn't...? hell, clarkson is top 10 goals scored right now
realistically nash can hit 40 with this team--right now i see him as a mid-to-high 30s guy when healthy. you can't tell me nash isn't creating enough opportunities when he is on the ice to hit 40 here in 82.
one of the best puck movers in the game when he was on, and when he is off he doesn't come close. richards missing camp royally ****ed us imo. tort's management of camp also did not help.
nash and gaborik together and healthy on this team can net 80 in an 82 no problem imo, but for that to happen richards has to be the guy that we saw at the end of last season. he has to be a threat on the ice. that's our problem right now, and the biggest positive is that it's apparently all mental and he can be that guy again.
shortened season--> everything is off. lundqvist is putting up numbers worse than bryzgalov. richards is horrible right now. stepan is our best forward(okay hagelin, but still). people are putting too much weight on this start.
View Public Profile
Kreider Typical's albums
Find More Posts by Kreider Typical