View Single Post
Old
02-24-2013, 05:24 PM
  #623
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,570
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Psycho T View Post
If the Hawks are trading for anything is C depth. While I agree with Savara and that I don't have total faith in our goalies, they have earned a chance this year with their play and I think we're OK on D depth for now. We see with Bolland out a game just how quickly our C depth falls. God help us if Toews ever misses a 2-3 game stretch, Bolland, Kruger, Shaw, Mayers, isn't exactly the C depth of a Cup winning team.

Doesn't even have to be a star player, just a reliable NHL C who can do what you expect from a 2-3 C. Win draws, back-check well, put up 40+ points. Because this team lacks it. Then you could slot Bolland back to #3 where he is best especially come play-offs.
You can say that about any team with their #1 centre. You don't make moves around potential injuries that may or may not happen in the future. I'm not saying Chicago shouldn't go out and get another centre, but you can't be worried about things that haven't/may not happen.

HockeySensible is offline