View Single Post
Old
02-25-2013, 02:57 AM
  #333
Djp
Registered User
 
Djp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Seattle,WA
Posts: 5,848
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunking278 View Post
Since the NHL seems hellbent on going with this model (which I don't like, btw), here's how they should do it:

CONF A - Boston, Montreal, NY Rangers, Ottawa, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Toronto, Washington (Wash moves to Conf B if Quebec City joins league as expansion franchise)

CONF B - Buffalo, Carolina, Columbus, Florida, New Jersey, NY Islanders, Tampa Bay



it.

Heck no...you are destroying rivals. Its as if Conference b is a hodge podge of left overs.

Confernece a teams will be pissed because it appears there is a serious competitive imbalance between the conferences.

As i have said before an alternate option is to go with a north/south cut

WEST, NORTH, SOUTH, EAST

WEST: ANA, SJ, LA, VAN, CGY, EDM, PHX/SEA, COL
SOUTH: DAL, STL, NASH, CAR, WAS, FL, TB
NORTH: WPG, MIN, CHI, DET, TOR, BUF, PIT, CBS
EAST: OTT, MON, BOS, NYR, NYI, NJ, PHI, **QC/TOR**

Djp is offline