View Single Post
02-25-2013, 03:25 PM
The Brodin Effect
MuckOG's Avatar
Join Date: May 2012
Location: In a tree stand.
Country: United States
Posts: 7,346
vCash: 133
Originally Posted by MN_Gopher View Post
That is simular to the reasoning of why we did not trade Sheppard, Gillies, Thelen, Fiala, Voloshenko, O'Sullivan, Cuma, or the corresponding pick. We were set for the future. Instead they did not turn out, Gabby unhappy left and we re-roll.

Proven players IMO have more value than what ifs.

Vanek just came to me,
Moulson in NYI is cheap, solid and is old enough were a Zucker or Coyle would be a simular player if they turn out. Youth to turn out with Tavares.
I don't remember many Wild fans thinking we were "set for the future" with that crew.

Originally Posted by rynryn View Post
still can't figure out the trade talk targeting prospects and picks (much less fire-sales) when we're one point out of the playoffs and #s 5 and 6 in the conference standings have two more points than us but both have played two more games. it's crazy.
..and if the Wild win tomorrow night, we'll see the posts asking which player should Fletcher target at the deadline to help make that Stanley Cup push!!

MuckOG is offline