View Single Post
02-26-2013, 08:13 AM
Registered User
garry1221's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Walled Lake, Mi
Posts: 2,228
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to garry1221
Originally Posted by swanny View Post
But shouldn't we learn from that rather than emulate it? I am against not having the best teams in the playoffs for the sake of some realignment.
How do you choose 'the best' 16 teams without playing each and every team in the league exactly the same number of times? Thus resulting in a leaguewide 1 - 16 seeding. If you look through this thread, you'll see the league pretty quicky did away with that scenario. A scenario like that would result in an 87 or 100+ regular season schedule.

Yes, some years one conference will be stronger than another, but you shouldn't be in the same playoff hunt as a team you only play twice per year as opposed to those teams you play 2.5 - 3 times that amount.

garry1221 is offline