View Single Post
02-26-2013, 12:36 PM
Seabrook = Thief
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 141,079
vCash: 302
Originally Posted by Sarava View Post
I don't see how that old format cost the Hawks any cups. Not getting the job done, the Edmonton Oilers, Mario Lemieux, Bill Wirtz...there's lots of reasons the Hawks went cupless so long. I don't see the divisional playoff format as one of them though.

And let's be honest. The Hawks proposed conference looks to be the weakest conference, both now and in to the future. There is only one team in that conference that would be considered a consistent big spender and that is the Hawks.

Where look at where Detroit is going, there's more big money teams. Eventually Montreal and Toronto will right the ship and that will both make it harder for Detroit to make the playoffs - and also advance when they do.
1990 really sucked as a kid. I thought the Hawks had the Oilers with series 2-1 in Conf finals

I was really excited by idea of Hawks/Bruins

Didn't know much about Bruins as a kid at time outside of the hockey cards I had

But as a kid there jersey's were great and it seemed you always got a Lemelin or Moog card in every pack of cards

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote