View Single Post
Old
02-26-2013, 02:39 PM
  #745
Hull Fan
trou du cul rapide
 
Hull Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Arlington, TX
Country: Albania
Posts: 5,977
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by StarsFan74 View Post
How deep exactly? I think the article specifically points to the 2013 draft not matching the 2003 draft, and I'd have to agree.
That's not really a fair comparison though. That 2003 draft might be the best ever. Not being as good as that isn't exactly a failure. The top ten looks amazing and even into the early 2nd there appears to be some decent talent. This one won't net the sheer number of players that '03 draft did but it's not 1999 awful.

The nice thing about the Stars is that they seem to take chances on guys who get injured and would have been higher had they played their draft year. Guys like Larsen, Vincour, Ritchie, Klingberg and the like. It sometimes fails, Troock but good players are found later sometimes and this draft has some potential for guys like that, ie Shore.

This is a draft that getting a top ten, if not top five pick would be huge. There is a talent drop off but there are several good players who will be available later on.

Hull Fan is offline