View Single Post
Old
02-28-2013, 06:51 AM
  #41
JACKETfan
Real Blue Jacketfan
 
JACKETfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Venice
Country: United States
Posts: 9,232
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double-Shift Lassť View Post
The same was said about Kansas City, Atlanta and Oakland. Which is apropos of nothing, but true nonetheless.

Short term, I think the 16-14 is just about appeasing both Detroit and Columbus. I think the league would like to simply swap Columbus and Winnipeg, but can't do so without angering a significant constituent in Ilitch and the Wings. Long-term, there may be hopes of expansion out west to balance the conferences, but there is significant support for a team in Quebec as well. And has the situation in Phoenix stabilized?

Anyway, to reiterate - I think the league wants to fix the Winnipeg situation, but is left with few palatable solutions.
I don't think the league cares that much about Columbus or Winnipeg. They have 0 leverage.
("Winnipeg, you're new, suck it up". "Columbus, until you stop sucking, shut up.")

I think they want Detroit in the East for $$.
And I think they see a natural rivalry for Pittsburgh in Cbus that's going unu$ed.

And I think they want/need the expansion $$. The franchise fees, new merchandise income, and television rights for two new teams is money in the bank for both the NHL owners and the NHLPA.

JACKETfan is offline   Reply With Quote