View Single Post
Old
02-28-2013, 08:17 AM
  #155
BoxerMax
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by EasternOntario Fan View Post
I think it was obvious that their vision at the draft was to get bigger, and they did do that----but at what cost. Having some knowledge of the 96 group, I don't think Hargrave was that bad of a pick, but I certainly question where the other two went. I certainly feel that there were better players available, but maybe others on this board with more knowledge can tell me if I am way off. My feeling is that they loved the size, but gambled because one had missed most of the year,and I think they took the other as a work in progress. Remember, they are still only sixteen and will probably improve, but based on production, the Sting have to be towards the bottom of the league with the performance of their rookies.
Renaud = Lucic

BoxerMax is offline