Around the League part deux
View Single Post
02-28-2013, 03:08 PM
Join Date: Jun 2011
Uhm I think we took different things away from the article.
The POINT of the article and a major issue in society is how people feel they can direct anything at professional athletes ( or anyone with out any consequences). I think a lot of things have been taken out of context. I don't think he meant a "hahaha" joke, rather it was a comment to show how hurt full comments could be, though he personally never felt that way.
Anyways, I don't think his contract enters into the fact that its not okay to direct the type of vitriol at him that he's been subject to.
It's your prerogative if you wouldn't be upset by something happening to him. But a lot of people were wishing negative things upon him.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by wpgsilver