Thread: Proposal: Mtl-phi
View Single Post
Old
02-28-2013, 09:26 PM
  #226
ginovegas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Shafer View Post
Definitely not. Both the Schenns and Simmonds are far too important to this team.

At this point, Couturier is likely more available because of Laughton coming behind him and our need for a #1 defenseman.

Honestly, that offer makes us worse now and in the future.

You want two B+ assets and a B asset for an A asset, two C assets, and a D asset.
just wondering who your A B C's are and especially the D

I see it more as
An A a B- a C+ and 1st in a deep draft
for a B+ and 2 B's

ginovegas is offline   Reply With Quote