View Single Post
02-28-2013, 11:30 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Auburn, Maine
Country: United States
Posts: 18,066
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to CHRDANHUTCH Send a message via MSN to CHRDANHUTCH Send a message via Yahoo to CHRDANHUTCH
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
You keep saying this and yet you ignore the fact that Seattle did the same damn thing and is right in the running for a team. You need to stop misleading people. NBA won't give a damn if Sacramento files a suit trying to keep their team.

You do realize it is within their power to reject the sale at that meeting, right? Why would the NBA give Sacramento the March 1st deadline for a proposal to keep the team if it was a done deal?
no, I agree w/ NFS, NAME THE Last sports league to block a relocation, PF.... and no, Seattle didn't do the same thing when Bennett moved the original franchise, why were the name/colors given back to the city for the next franchise, then, PF, as part of Bennett's exit, REMEMBER he also owned the WNBA Storm which was sold to Force Ten, LLC, and remained in Seattle while he took the Sonics to OKC... Schultz had no more rights to the Sonics once he sold them to Bennett, that's why that haphazard attempt went nowhere once Schultz found out that was Bennett's intent.

CHRDANHUTCH is offline