View Single Post
03-01-2013, 10:24 AM
Registered User
417's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa
Country: Haiti
Posts: 24,575
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Kriss E View Post
And being used less than almost every other D at ES, and being the least used one on the PK where he excelled is also a good thing?

Looking at the record is meaningless. Otherwise, why did we trade Cole? After all, we were winning.

Point is, PK is our best Dman, or at the very least 2nd best. Yet he's being used as a PP specialist, getting very little ice time at ES and on the PK.

To me it just seems like they want PK to start from scratch. Not a strategy I understand, and certainly not one explainable by the fact that we are currently winning games.
Hey....I don't disagree, like I said, I find their use of Subban and the organizations evaluation of Subban, at least from my point of view, somewhat puzzling

But I personally find trouble focusing on Subban's use when the team as a general is playing so well.

Markov/Emelin + Gorges/Diaz (when he was healthy) were performing very yeah, I think the team would probably be better used with Subban playing more. But they are playing well

You can't ignore their current performance...and this is coming from a HUGE Subban fan.

I agree in principle with, I just don't see why this needs to be an issue above the team...Subban is probably playing the type of role and minutes he SHOULD of been playing last year.

417 is offline