View Single Post
Old
03-02-2013, 06:09 AM
  #90
14ari13
Registered User
 
14ari13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 10,436
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fading Captain View Post
I think that's silly.
Having Tatar playing the way he does will make Datsyuk more dynamic.

And having Datsyuk play dynamic is a lot more important that having a fourth line play with some pop


It's funny watching people defend Babcock on this. Just like they defended Lashoff on the top pairing (a decision that cost us several points in the standings)
I do not know why Babcock waited for so long to put Ericsson with Kronwall intstead of Lashoff, but he did it in the end.
I think it will be the same with Tatar. Babcock simply can't have Abby and Cleary with Datsyuk. Everybody sees that it is wasting Datsayuk's talent.
Franzen-Z-Brunner
Cleary-Datsyuk-Tatar
or if Babcock really wants to keep those 2 lines, then
Abby-Z-Brunner
Franzen-Datsyuk-Cleary
Dastyuk needs a player he can pass to.
A huge problem with Abby and Cleary is:
1. They do not know how to get open so Dastyuk can't pass the puck to them
2. They can't pass the puck to Datsyuk
3. They can't score (Obviously Abby 1 point in his last 35 games.

Yet, Babcock plays Abby on the PP. Abby has no business there. I would rather play Eaves on the PP than Abby.

14ari13 is offline   Reply With Quote