View Single Post
03-02-2013, 02:27 PM
Join Date: Nov 2011
Originally Posted by
Time will tell I guess. I would have been more at ease with this attempt, idiocy notwithstanding, had ROR had a few years of producing decent numbers like last season. I like him, but a bit of a stretch to say he is a number one. He would be at the low end on number ones with great potential.
He is supposed to be a real good leader type. That is always good. It would have been a good pick up, but I am not sure his numbers will get much better, but agreed, he is only 22.
It sounds as if Feaster may have been right about the rule after all, there are several blogs posting that Feaster actually has a case and would most likely have won his case. It may be the case that Sportsnet is indeed a sub par source.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheHudlinator