Thread: Options at #1
View Single Post
03-03-2013, 05:52 PM
major major
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 3,854
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by EspenK View Post
I don't get the logic- If I'm supposed to pick the BPA (say Jones at 1) why would I trade him to get the BPA (say Lindholm at 6) at a lower level but not chose a guy who is the next BPA (say Mackinnon at 2) but happens to be a forward. I think you buy into that theory way too much. The throw in for that kind of a deal (2nd rounder) is probably a pick where the odds of them being successful are much less.

PS I used the top guys to illustrate a point because I know their names and relative positions not to advocate giving up Jones to get Lindholm.

Probably an agree to disagree situation.
You get way more than a second rounder for dropping from 1 to 6. Remember when the Isles offered us their entire draft for the #2, and it wasn't nearly enough? I think you could get next year's first rounder just for dropping from 1 to 3 or 4.

major major is offline   Reply With Quote