Thread: Rumor: Pittsburgh eyeing Iginla
View Single Post
Old
03-05-2013, 08:30 PM
  #117
OCPenguin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,688
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CGYPUKSUX View Post
Unfortunately it seems every prospect suggested is inside the Penguins' top 3. That's what makes this a very difficult thing to negotiate amongst fans. Everyone thinks their prospects are so great, not realizing they are just another kid with potential who may or may not make it to the show. Sitting on a prospect that might not develop at the NHL level is pretty stupid when you're close to winning a championship. Think the Flames regret trading Brett Hull to the Blues for Ramage and Wamsley? Not a chance. Wamsley allowed Vernon to rest down the stretch and Ramage was key for the Flames in post-season after Suter went down. Without that trade the Flames don't win the cup.

Frankly, I think the Pens and the Flames should make a blockbuster and the Pens should go for it. The Penguins need a depth blueliner, a top six winger and a goaltender (Fleury is questionable) to make a serious run. I think Iginla, Kiprusoff and Butler/Sarich meet the needs and make Pittsburgh almost unstoppable. The only question is what are the Penguins willing to give up to become that favorite?
Why is it Calgary fans want to send us three of four pieces to **** us of prospects and picks, while we need only one piece. We have Fleury. He is our starting goalie. We don't acquire Kipper to be a backup. Butler isn't that good and neither is Sarich. What exactly do they provide? Either of those two don't help make Pittsburgh unstoppable.

Pittsburgh only seems to care about one player - that is Iggy. That's it, unless maybe Glencross becomes available. The others make zero sense.

OCPenguin is offline   Reply With Quote