Arbitration ruining hockey
View Single Post
07-25-2006, 07:00 PM
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Western Canuckland
Originally Posted by
Again, this means that more movement will be an inevitability. But we already knew this when the CBA was signed.
Because salaries are tied to revenues, and because of the revenue sharing, no team will be
, and no team will be at a real disadvantage.
The teams that are good at the draft table will still gain more assets and hold those assets for dirt-cheap prices for several years.
There's no reason teams
be able to hold a player 'captive' until they're of X age as has been the case forever in hockey. It doesn't happen in any other profession.
Ratcheting will lead to walking away means free agency which means loss of assets
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by toshiro