Thread: Proposal: edm ott
View Single Post
03-09-2013, 10:31 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,715
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by jbeck5 View Post
Obviously i think ottawa would have to add. But you're underrating bishop. He may be a backup now, but he has starter potential.

It's like me calling MPS a bottom 6 forward.

It's like me saying "i'm not trading a goalie who's been playing like an all star the past couple weeks for a bottom 6 forward"

Obviously i'm smart enough to know that MPS has potential. Maybe it would be wise for you to admit bishop has potential. You don't trade a 2nd for an inexperienced goalie if he only has backup potential.

So essentially it's a bottom 6 forward with top 6 potential for a backup goalie with starter potential. The forward has more raw talent, and is younger, therefore has more value.

I would offer:

3rd round pick



Edmonton declines this though.

Edmonton keeps him for the potential...ottawa doesn't give up much more due to risk.
This is an absolute joke, right? Ottawa has to add to acquire MPV, MPS or whatever the heck his name is? He hasn't done anything the last two years in Edmonton to render such a return. Quit overrating this guy. I wouldn't trade Bishop straight up for MPV if I were Ottawa.

OCPenguin is offline   Reply With Quote