View Single Post
03-10-2013, 12:49 PM
Garbage Goal
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 17,150
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by YuioIklo View Post
This is the worst stat ever. You can't compare things like that, 100 points on 3 spots means 33 points by player. There's players to replace them, it's litterally nothing. Voracek took Jagr's spot on the top line and produces more than him. JVR... wasn't playing for half of the season and we still won a lot. The improvement of the younger players definitely covers the loss of Jagr and JVR. Matt Carle is definitely better than L. Schenn right now, I've never compared them, but : is Carle that much better? Can he transform the worst team in the league into a playoffs team? I don't think so. Our offense is still stacked.
Explain how that's a bad stat. It's two guys we would have used in our top six and a top four d. Carle is much more proven and his play style and skillset fits this team more then Lukes does.

Garbage Goal is offline   Reply With Quote