View Single Post
Old
03-12-2013, 12:05 PM
  #117
arsmaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,977
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleach Clean View Post
I figured the comparison to Alberts was one made on ability? If it was, and Alberts is a depth D here, would O'Byrne not be the same?

Would you pay Alberts 2m?
I would not pay Alberts that. I was thinking more about replacing Ballard and Alberts with O'Byrne (I think AV wouldn't oppose).

But really, at this point we're paying 6.3m for defensman 6/7/8. It now looks like we can use the #8 spot as an ELC non-waiver eligible prospect in the farm.

I don't think we'll need a full time #8 on the roster in this case. I have no problem treating O'Byrne as what I figure he is - a full time #6.

arsmaster is offline