CBJ vs. VAN
View Single Post
03-13-2013, 07:55 AM
Join Date: Aug 2005
Originally Posted by
That is my contention. The NHL seems to have made an exception for what is, essentially, a gimic move. A thing of beauty as others suggest? I find nothing exciting about that move.
It is allowed, so good goal. I'm not bitter about the loss, I think we were eventually going to lose in the SO anyway. However, whether it's a Canuk or Jacket scoring that goal, I find it just as lame this morning as I did last night. The owners have strange hangups on certain things in hockey, so I have no doubt this unfortunate exception will continue to exist.
Its garbage. He comes to a complete stop with one foot in the crease, spins back out of the crease, and deposits the puck in the far side of the goal. How in the hell is that a legit SO goal?
I know we didn't play well, probably got a point we didn't truly deserve thanks to Bobs overall performance, but I went to bed pissed about that result and woke up pissed as well.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Nordique