View Single Post
03-13-2013, 11:58 PM
Kriss E
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: hong kong
Posts: 33,723
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by coolasprICE View Post
I don't buy this anti-chambre theory that Subban's success on the powerplay is largely because of Markov.

Yes, Markov helps him, but the ''general'' of that PP is now Subban.
The guys from antichambre blasted PK during his holdout. Heck, they even stated that it may be better for the team not to bring him back, because the team was winning and well, maybe we just don't need him all that much.
I swear, I don't understand how this town can be so proud about knowing hockey and yet say so many dumb things.

Markov is a great set up guy on the PP. It really helps to have him there. It also helps him a lot to have PK there too. Which of the two is more important? I'd say they're pretty equal. But overall, PK is undoubtedly our #1.

Kriss E is online now   Reply With Quote