View Single Post
03-14-2013, 10:10 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,930
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by CHRDANHUTCH View Post
then answer this question: WHY Did the Maloofs back out of the deal that had been originally proposed for Sacramento, WHICH IS WITHIN THEIR RIGHTS, as owners, Clowe.... Who's going to block the PSA that Stern himself said back in 2008, that Seattle gets right of 1st refusal, the approval is all but a done deal, which impacts the original Sonics deal that allowed Bennett to go to OKC, back then, the caveats being that the Sonics color schematic, logo, AND HISTORY went w/ the Thunder and has been since '08, and the history reverts as soon as another franchise, whether it's the current Kings or someone else takes over the franchise and reestablishes the Sonics franchise... Burkle wasn't involved in Sacramento until recently when the proposed downtown arena surfaced, hence why Mastrov is the bidder for the Kings if they stay... Precedence and an Al Davis type lawsuit will definitely follow if the Hansen deal is blocked.
The Al Davis type lawsuit will only work if Hansen is approved as new owner of the Kings and the NBA block relocation.

gstommylee is offline