Discussion: Should Tampa Bay Re-Address Their Goaltending?
View Single Post
03-15-2013, 11:49 AM
Join Date: Sep 2012
Originally Posted by
I agree that acquiring Lindback was not a poor move. He could turn out to be a good goalie so it's far too early to write him off.
I think though it was a poor move throwing him in as your number one. A solid vet who could start the majority of the games would have been the way to go, IMO. Let Lindback ease himself into a more prominent role without the pressure. I'm not very impressed with Yzerman's moves over the last year. He also needed to address the defensive issues and Salo while a good player was never the answer.
It was said (from SY and Boucher) Lindbäck and Garon should split playing time, but Garon is injured right now and before somehow Boucher ignored his own words.
I think SY did a solid job, no Tampa fan did expect what Salo brings to the team, well and I think the Carle contract was a victim of the market and everybody expects a lot more from Carle, in summer Tampa fans were really happy with the D SY got together.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Jacko95