View Single Post
Old
03-16-2013, 12:10 AM
  #77
Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
 
Mrb1p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Citizen of the world
Country: Canada
Posts: 21,457
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by live playoff hockey View Post
you cant call a guy like Gallagher a core player, but not allow guys like Silfverberg and Zibanejad to also be called core players. Just because one has been producing at a better clip doesnt change their value imo, on this type of sample size, you cannot be added to a core. For example, Kassian was playing top line minutes for the Canucks and scoring at a ridiculous rate, did that make him a core player for the Canucks at that time? No, of course not! You cannot hold the double standard that your blue chip prospects are more worthy of being deemed core players than other teams.
Half a season now... It's been half a season of Gallagher playing better than Bourque, Gionta, Prust, Moen, Armstrong and Galchenyuk.

Is Huberdeau a core player in Florida? Tarasenko in ST-Louis? IMO yes they are because the impact they make is essential to the team success

I've already dismissed Galchenyuk so stop bringing him up.

Mrb1p is offline   Reply With Quote