View Single Post
03-17-2013, 01:40 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Da Big Apple
Country: United States
Posts: 11,501
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Kwayry View Post
That makes more sense. What do you have in mind? and please keep it short, tough to read an essay when you have alcohol in your system.
1. It is ok to discuss something around Skjei for Clendenning
2. It is ok to consider if, having first made a determination that basically Boyle for Olsen + pick is your max return, then to view if it is useful for flexibility purposes to be included in a larger deal.

I posted something with detail, so the complexities of the deal were adequately addressed.
I suggest you read it.
It appears we need an expansive deal to get something balanced with all the parts both sides want and can live with.

People want simple solutions to complex problems. This is usually fantasy.
The world usually requires complex solutions to actually address complex problems.

Do the homework, come to a consensus which is thorough.
THEN, knowing we have the figured out what is the best option, that is the one we can get behind (until a new better option develops).

THEN have that drink. I'll buy the first round.

But put up the homework to do a fully informed critique.
Or don't be informed, and by extension the legit basis to be critical.

bernmeister is offline