View Single Post
03-17-2013, 06:02 PM
Registered User
chosen's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,102
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Fataldogg View Post
3rd line has to produce. I understand that on a team your top-6 has to be the BIG contributors, but on deep teams you will have 3rd line players hit 40 points.

Gaborik has 8 goals. Boyle has 1. Boyle on pace for 3 goals over the course of a regular season is probably more of an underachievement than Gaborik on pace for 25.

Most 3rd line players should score ~ 10 goals, and 30-40points. On a real deep team you might have a top 3rd liner hit 50 points. Those are those players who are on the cusp of a 2nd line or have 2nd line talent but their role is more suited for the checking unit. The Rangers 3rd line isn't even pacing at 10 points for a regular season. It's pathetic.

The Rangers slumping superstars wouldn't seem as bad as it was if we even got a goal from our third line once every three games.

Who scored for the Penguins yesterday? Wasn't Crosby, Kunitz, Neal, etc.

Brandon Sutter on the Penguins is the perfect example of what a 3rd line player should be. He is a 2nd line/3rd line talent, in his role can play effectively on the third line, and can produce 15 goals and 30+ points. That's what a decent third line forward should be doing.
Pittsburgh has a far superior front office compared to the Rangers. That said, please don't pick one game where it wasn't Crosby, Kunitz, and Neal. That is anecdotal. They are consistent producers. Our top guys aren't. That part, the blame falls squarely on Sather, not Torts.

chosen is offline   Reply With Quote