ok what's wrong with QUICK!?
View Single Post
03-18-2013, 02:56 PM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Guelph, ON
Originally Posted by
That doesn't make any sense. If you are taking out those 6 wins then that means someone else was in net and that someone else would be Quick. And you are saying that we would win none of those 6 games. So Quick would be 0-6 in those games.
You can't just take out 6 wins and say we would be in last place. You do that on any team it will be the same way.
The faulty math goes both ways. It was ASSUMED after that Quick would maintain the same record as Bernier 6-2.. Bernier has let in 15 goals. By the math of save percentage, all things being held equal, Quicks save % would suggest he would have let in 20 goals, or 5 more then Bernier over that span. When or where or how those goals were scored, could dictate a different record then 6-2. So I see neither side as being correct, although both hold slight points of validity.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by SoulAssassin