View Single Post
03-20-2013, 03:22 AM
Registered User
Kwayry's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Plano
Country: United States
Posts: 2,972
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Trxjw View Post
Why? Because Fisher would immensely improve our 3C position. That's not even remotely debatable. You stated that I "think trading for Fisher is a better solution" when I never said anything remotely close to that. I've said it's a more realistic solution and that the return addressed 3 current team needs. Pretty simple concept

Here is the way I see it.
When 2 proposals, 1 and 2, are being discussed and you say that
A - proposal 1 is unrealistic.
B - proposal 2 would immensely help the team and it's not even remotely debatable
C - proposal 2 is more realistic.

That implies that you like proposal 2 more than proposal 1.
I don't know of any other way to explain it.

As to Fisher coming to the Rangers, I think it's more unrealistic actually. He has a NTC and his wife is a big star country singer from Nashville, he ain't moving to NYC.
And his 4.2M contract running until he is 35 makes his short term value a pretty expensive proposition long term.
Besides the fact that Sather rarely takes back more terms in a trade.

I don't wanna make this a long running feud, so I will agree to disagree and move on.

But I am still right

Kwayry is offline