View Single Post
03-20-2013, 10:31 PM
Registered User
NorthStar4Canes's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,371
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ohashi_Jouzu View Post
And you know, I'd love to see the conversation go down that route instead of "hurr... consecutive is better... durrrrr..." Perhaps it would even out in the end, perhaps not. Either way it's a fundamental part of weighing these two dynasties, imo, since the number of championships isn't the deciding factor between the two, and there are numerous stars at their peak on either side; it's obviously part "how" they won them, as well. Lots of the second S in K.I.S.S. trying to claim that it is as simple as counting to 4 the fastest, though.
Consecutive championships trumps non-consecutive every time when it comes to "dynasty". Remaining on top after reaching the top is as fundamental as it gets to the question no matter how much you wish otherwise or try to imply those that disagree with you are stupid. If the Oil had won 4 straight, then you'd have a starting point for the rest of your argument down the route you want (where you're trying to prove the Oil was a better team or something. that's a different question). As it stands, their unblemished streak of Cups doesn't match the Isles.

Last edited by NorthStar4Canes: 03-20-2013 at 11:20 PM.
NorthStar4Canes is offline   Reply With Quote