View Single Post
03-21-2013, 01:03 PM
Just a Fool
Rhiessan71's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Guelph, Ont
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,546
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by eva unit zero View Post
Lindros vs. Fedorov is an interesting comparison.

Fedorov easily wins the skating and defense competition. Lindros was the better goal scorer and the more dominant physical player.

However, I find it difficult to vote for Lindros for one simple reason; Mario Lemieux.

Lindros was, overall, better defensively and more aggressive physically than Lemieux. But there is not a single other aspect mentioned by the OP that Lemieux does not have the advantage in; sometimes by a ridiculous amount. And when it comes to physical domination, it's inaccurate to state Lemieux (or Fedorov/Jagr, for that matter, but especially Lemieux) was not physically dominant. Despite not generally initiating contact or fighting much, Lemieux is arguably the most physically dominant player of the post-expansion era. With regards to physical dominance simply for offensive purposes, the "arguably" can be dropped.

And the only real argument Lindros has to be placed ahead of Fedorov is his physical dominance; meaning he has to instead contend with the virtually unstoppable Lemieux.

The goal at 3:48 is a good example of the kind of thing I'm talking about with Lemieux's strength. And of course there are all of the ones showcasing his skills.
Really? That's your argument?
That Fedorov is better than Lindros because Lindros most likely wouldn't have been able to contain one of, if not THE most physically un-containable players in the history of the game???

That's some logic there

Rhiessan71 is offline   Reply With Quote