Thread: Proposal: Luongo for Grabovski
View Single Post
03-22-2013, 03:07 PM
Sergei Shirokov
Registered User
Sergei Shirokov's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: British Columbia
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,230
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Liferleafer View Post
You know...i could sprinkle icing sugar and gumdrops on top of a steaming pile of ****....i could then tell everybody "it really doesn't taste that bad" the end of the day, it still tastes like a steaming pile of ****.
Go look at the details yourself.

So many Leaf fans saying its bad, and I doubt most of them even know the ins and outs of what the deal actually entails and what that might mean in terms of the affect on your team.

Probably not as bad as what you think.

Originally Posted by Zoombie View Post
Scrivens is just to back up Schneids while Lack is injured. If he didnt go in the trade, he will be waived by TO anyways to fit Louie.

I don't think Nonis is going to retain salary out of the goodness of his heart, what does he care if Vancouver is up against the cap? Van is no worse off than if they keep Luongo, but paying 2 starting goalies in the salary cap era doesn't make much sense.
Exactly, he would be lost either way. So really no value.

I think he would retain it if that is what makes the deal go through. Especially if the retain is something as little as 500k - 1 Mill.

Sergei Shirokov is offline   Reply With Quote