View Single Post
Old
08-06-2006, 09:54 AM
  #28
Maxpac
Registered User
 
Maxpac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: hockey city
Posts: 13,841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnett View Post
I personally think LA doesn't have enough to offer excluding the players mentioned. But here is my counter propsal because Im a average arm chair GM

Ryder, Souray, Ribs, 3rd
for
Frolov, Conroy, Gleason, 1st

Ryder> Flolov. But Frolov is 24 years old with upside and under a good contact till 2010. Ryder likely gone in a 1 to 2 years in my opinion.

Ribs < Conroy. Conroy is bigger, faster, better at faceoffs and can put up 50-70 pts between Kovy, and Sammy.

Gleason < Souray. Souray 20 goals a big shot for the poweplay. But Souray in a UFA and Montreal will have problems signing Souray, Markow and Rivet. The D-men depth is weak.

1st> 3rd to offset Ryder and Souray comparsion above. Montreal doesn't want to trade two of the three anyway so LA have to overpay.
that's overpayment for the Kings

Maxpac is offline   Reply With Quote