Thread: Value of: Ales Hemsky at the Deadline
View Single Post
Old
03-23-2013, 12:05 PM
  #217
Eskimo44
Registered User
 
Eskimo44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,195
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtaveras4pres View Post
because that they were waived wasnt the point, the point was that their risks and costs were higher than their value....which may be the case with Hemsky

what is shameful is that Oiler fans, who apparently value Hemsky very highly, keep offering him around in trade..... if he's so valuable to you all why not say he's an Oiler for life and not available?

The majority of opposing fans have been very clear that they dont think his associated risks are worth the price that Oiler fans place on him

it seems that most Oiler fans have a habit of offering players that no one wants (relative to the asking price) while getting insulted when teams instead counter with one of Hall, RNH, Eberle, or Yakupov. Its really rather pathetic.
Nice straw man but i'll bite anyways.

Being waived and unclaimed means they have no value. Are you really this confused. Ales Hemsky is not comparabble to Wade Redden the fact i have to tell you that should make you feel shame.

Did it ever occur to you that many Oiler fans have different views. I wouldn't trade Hemsky. Good teams don't trade their best players, they add to them. When was the last time you remember Detroit unloading a top 6 forward in their prime?

Hall, Nuge, Yakupov are 1st overalls. They have ridiculous value for numerous reasons. A) They almost always become superstar level talents. B) They are under team control for a long time. C) They are usually cheaper to sign then other player's of their caliber due to their age and RFA status. The only time 1st overalls get dealt is when they don't reach their potential right away, like Johnson. And even then Johnson had a lot of value.

Eberle was 15th in scoring last year and he was 21. Do you not realize how exceptional that is. How many teams trade guys like this? Even if a Shea Weber is avaliable who is going to give up even a top 30 scorer under 23 for him? Nobody probably will because it's counter productive. We see it all the time when guys like Pronger, Burns, Heatley, ect.. get traded it's not for the other teams best player unless he's on the block himself it's for a package of quality assets. History should not be ignored.

Eskimo44 is offline   Reply With Quote