Do the Canucks need a shakeup?
View Single Post
03-23-2013, 11:12 PM
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: RED DEER ALBERTA
Originally Posted by
This is a great article.
And I agree with most of it. No need to blow up the core. But we do need some minor tweaks to get players that properly complement that core.
But the article stops short of endorsing AV (stays quite neutral for him, other than to say that the Caps blew it by firing Boudreau and changing their game completely).
Charron also talks about the Red Wings, but IMO they are a bit of a special case because:
1. They did have many players who had won a cup previously.
2. They had Lidstrom.
Also, I stand by my assertion that it's AV that needs replacing, by also using Detroit - they lost in the first couple of years since they hired Babcock, but they still dominated in the regular season. IIRC they won the Cup in his 3rd year. AV OTOH has been here for 7 years, long in the tooth by most standards.
Of course injuries have been huge this year.
But to me (and others) the team has struggled to score for well over a year now, relying on elite goaltending, and were completely outclassed by the Kings in the playoffs. Add in head-scratching personnel decisions, and going back to the same breakouts even when we don't seem to have the personnel to successfully implement it......
Perhaps if we can add a guy like Visnovsky who has a great hockey IQ, when this team gets healthy it can do better under AV's system and we can take a decent run at it before throwing in the towel on him.
Yeah we stayed the course last year,look where that got us.Out in the first round.This year ,i have not seen that much more improvment.So unless MG can pull a bunny out of his hat,i dont hold no hope.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MAGICMAN1963