View Single Post
03-25-2013, 10:37 AM
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,544
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Riverdale View Post
In the playoffs you need a 3rd line that can help out. The rangers barelyhave one; thats a problem. No-one is saying the top lines don't need to be consistant. If they were playing better we'd STILL NEED A GOOD 3rd line. Just like last year. Why is it always one or the other? If someone says they want the bottom 6 improved that means they don't want the top lines to produce more ? No. It means the bottom 6 just sucks.
You can pick one:

Gaborik and Richards perform


We have a 3rd line center

Obviously both are concerns, but his point was that so many people are focusing on the bottom-six as if that the main problem. If you improve the bottom-six we're probably holding a few more wins. If you get the Gaborik and Richards of last year we're probably giving Pittsburgh a run for their money.

TheRightWay is offline