View Single Post
03-25-2013, 01:41 PM
Registered User
FlyersFan61290's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 9,308
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by DrinkFightFlyers View Post
Yet another good point. I truly believe that an outsider that saw Eriksson's stats and age compared to the other guys I mentioned and conclude that Eriksson was a cut above the rest based on the 1.5 years younger he is than the two 24 year olds. They certainly wouldn't consider the fact that their stats at the same age were similar (some actually better for the 24 year olds at Eriksson's age). Yup. That 1.5 years is all the diference.
But Eriksson has the better numbers the past two yrs and yes is almost 2 yrs younger so yes he should be considered above the others. Why is that so wrong. Again not that they shouldn't be considered at all just that eriksson should be considered above the others. How is that biased?

FlyersFan61290 is offline   Reply With Quote