View Single Post
03-25-2013, 01:42 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 26,473
vCash: 50
Originally Posted by HossTheBoss View Post
Q coached one of the most talented teams of the past 10 years to a Cup and has done nothing of note since. With Chicago's talent, even last year, they should have gotten past Phoenix. It wasn't Bowman's fault the team couldn't score on the PP, couldn't kill off a penalty and didn't know what the **** to do in the defensive zone. Those are all 100% on the coaching staff/players, but more on the coaching staff.

Q deserves credit for the start they've had, but Bowman deserves just as much. He's added all the necessary peices to enable Chicago to get off to this start and didn't panic in the off-season like many though he would.
I just want to be clear on something, Bowman has never done anything wrong while Q has, correct? I am talking year to year, Bowman has always had good years while Q has left a lot to be desired most of the time, correct?

digdug41982 is offline   Reply With Quote