View Single Post
03-25-2013, 01:47 PM
Smug Teuvo
HockeySensible's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,385
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84 View Post
I just want to be clear on something, Bowman has never done anything wrong while Q has, correct? I am talking year to year, Bowman has always had good years while Q has left a lot to be desired most of the time, correct?

2010/11 was pretty much a lost year because Bowman couldn't afford to give Q much and Q, understandably, didn't do much with the roster. It was a write off.

2011-12 was on Q and co. There's not much difference between this years team and last years and yet, last year, the looked like a mess on a lot of nights and especially in the playoffs.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote