In-season Proposals, Rumors, Free Agents & Roster Moves (related topics) XXXIV
View Single Post
03-25-2013, 03:18 PM
Join Date: May 2011
Originally Posted by
Fair enough, didn't mean to generalize. I just don't get the arguments against him, that's all. I don't get your argument that he will "revert" to the player he was in Toronto and New York. If he does, that's fine, that guy was a good hockey player.
I also don't buy the arguments that he can't play center and can't pass. Okay, he's not a star in either category, but I don't see why he has to be.
Trust me when I say the Rangers don't know jack **** when it comes to valuing role players. Toronto is the same.
No hard feelings from my side of things.
Anyway I was just trying to say that they should consider moving Mitchell if they don't have him in their long term plans because his value is most likely at its highest right now, if they think they should hang on to him for a longer period of time that goes beyond his current contract I have absolutely no problem with that.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Ivan13