View Single Post
03-27-2013, 03:32 PM
Registered User
EverettMike's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Everett, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 29,469
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by bp13 View Post
It's funny Mike...I held this EXACT same opinion until last week. Literally the exact same feeling. Then I started coming around to the idea that I'm a fan. If he's clearly your hottest hitter as of today, how can you justify putting a lesser team on the field for 9 crucial games?

It seems the side defending demoting him is trying to minimize the importance of 10 games. But they are simultaneously exaggerating the likelihood that that year of control matters much in the long run, if at all.
10 games versus 162 games at a better number for the team.

Seems easy, especially when you think how little one player can really impact 10 games.

EverettMike is online now