View Single Post
03-28-2013, 09:47 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,784
vCash: 982
Originally Posted by Capitano View Post
Well the consensus is that Pittsburgh got Iginla for pretty much getting a guy like Jagr would cost less in theory...I agree you though, can't trade any great prospects for the short term...but I'm all for trading prospects that we don't consider blue chippers 100%
The Iginla trade:
Iginla was dictating his future, so only a few teams could bid for him instead of an open hunt where his value would have been a lot more

Their GM is Feaster, no need to say more

HatTricK09 is offline