View Single Post
03-29-2013, 08:58 PM
Lafleurs Guy
Global Moderator
Lafleurs Guy's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 44,173
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Kriss E View Post
Bobby Orr scored 120 in 1970. That's 43 years ago. You cannot compare eras, it's dumb.

Bobby Orr would not score 120pts if he was 22 playing today in a full NHL season. Would not happen. Watch a game from the 70s, then watch one today, it's two different leagues. Players today are in much better conditioning, much faster, stronger, equipment is completely different, opposition is a lot stronger.

Who would be better Orr vs PK had they played at the same time? Who freaking knows. Everything is different. Orr scored 135pts in his last season with the Bruins, when's the last time we saw a player score 135pts in the NHL? Does this mean Orr would be the best player today? No it doesn't.

You can't compare eras. Everything was different.
Just as an aside, I don't see why Orr couldn't score 120. The next closest scorer had 99 points... that's comparable to today. If anything Orr might've actually done better.

Lafleurs Guy is offline   Reply With Quote