View Single Post
03-30-2013, 01:13 AM
Registered User
Lundsanity30's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 13,520
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by NY Lito View Post
With the way Nash has been playing at RW, no, don't think so.

You're blind if you think Gaborik's a better RW, or player, than Nash.

And you know he was "brought in here as a LW" how? Guarantee it was Sather's and Torts' intentions to play him at RW from the get-go.
If that's the case they r bigger fools than I thought. Rangers already hard Gaborik (41) and callahan (29) last year. We had no competent lw other than hags since kreider was an unknown. and Nash has played the majority of his career on LW. But hey nash does look good on the RW at the expense of the Rangers most prolific goal scorer in how long looks lost not playing his natural side

Lundsanity30 is online now